{"id":17370,"date":"2021-03-22T12:13:03","date_gmt":"2021-03-22T11:13:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/eko-unia.org.pl\/?p=17370"},"modified":"2021-03-27T11:46:06","modified_gmt":"2021-03-27T10:46:06","slug":"stop-the-expansion-of-the-river-oder","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/eko-unia.org.pl\/en\/stop-the-expansion-of-the-river-oder\/","title":{"rendered":"STOP the expansion of the River Oder!"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

https:\/\/eko-unia.org.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Joint-declaration_PL.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Joint declaration: Germany, Poland, European Commission, Council of Europe Development Bank and World Bank must STOP labeling expansion for economic interests as “flood protection\u201d <\/h4>\n\n\n\n

STOP measures that actually deteriorate flood protection and infringe EU Environmental Law; <\/h4>\n\n\n\n

STOP the expansion of the River Oder! <\/h4>\n\n\n\n

We urge the European Commission and the German and Polish governments to stop the cross\u0002border expansion projects on the Oder River and on the \u201cKlucz-Ustowo ditch\u201d (German: \u201cKl\u00fctzer Querfahrt\u201d\/ Polish: \u201cprzekop Klucz-Ustowo\u201c) and to protect people and the environment from their destructive effects.2 Scientists, Environmental associations, social movements and political parties in Poland and Germany have been following the expansion projects on the Oder and on the \u201cKlucz-Ustowo ditch\u201d with great concern. Both projects are agreed in a German-Polish agreement from 2015 and partially financed by the Council of Europe Development Bank (CEB), the World Bank and by EU co-funding.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Three main arguments have been identified in relation to this issue: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

1. The planned measures will deteriorate and not increase flood protection:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Although it has been claimed, that the expansion of Oder serves flood protection, in contrary it has become clear, that it will increase the risk of flooding on both sides of the border, especially for the region of the \u201cOderbruch\u201d (Polish: \u201cKotlina Freienwaldzka\u201d). This is stated even in the official \u201cConcept for Regulation\u201d for Border Oder conducted by the German Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute (BAW). Therefore, the Ministry of Agriculture, Environment and Climate Protection of the State of Brandenburg \u2014 authority responsible for flood protection in the most endangered regions \u2014 rejects this \u201cflood protection\u201d project. The plans also violate EU law and endanger not only the environment, but also agriculture on both sides of the river. This has also been confirmed by the Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Germany\u2019s largest freshwater research center. The main argument for justifying expansion is, that the measures are needed to guarantee navigability for icebreakers used to avoid ice jam floods. But German shipping authorities have confirmed that icebreakers have always been able to finish their operations without problems. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

2. Expansion of the River Oder will infringe EU-Environmental Law and release of CO2: <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The expansion plans for the Oder would lead to unacceptable damage to ecosystems, intensified by the ongoing climate crisis. These \u201cflood control\u201d measures violate European environmental law and will have significant effects on ecosystems and biodiversity, since they will endanger natural landscapes which are habitats for valuable and protected species. This applies in particular to the habitat types and species protected by the EU Flora-Fauna-Habitat (FFH) Directive in the numerous. Natura 2000 sites along the Oder and in particular the natural features of the \u201cLower Oder Valley National Park\u201d. Therefore, these projects are not compatible either with the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) nor the EU Habitats Directive. They are also not compatible with the EU Environmental Liability Directive nor with the EU Directives on the Assessment and Management of Flood Risks, Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA). In short, these plans cannot be reconciled with the European \u201cGreen Deal\u201d and the associated goals of the EU with regard to combating environmental degradation. In addition, the desiccation of the floodplains will lead to an enormous release of CO2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

3. Using World Bank, CEB and EU Funds for expansion instead of flood protection is a misuse of funds: <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Polish government has applied for EU, CEB and World Bank funds based on the goal of flood protection – and only for this purpose can the funds be used. But it has become clear, that the expansion of the Oder is a shipping project serving primarily the interests of a few companies – and contrary to the official project goals, the flood risk could even increase. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since it has become clear that the project primarily serves economic interests, the funds cannot be used. The EU, the CEB and the World Bank therefore have to check if funding conditions are violated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

We urge the Government of the Republic of Poland and the Federal Government of Germany: <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2022 to stop labeling an inland navigation project as a \u201cflood protection\u201d project, because the flood protection is even deteriorated by the project, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2022 to stop all plans which involve the expansion on the Oder, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2022 to take ambitious steps to preserve and protect the natural landscapes and ecosystems along the Oder in full compliance with EU Law. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

We urge the European Commission:<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2022 to listen to the citizens of Poland and Germany, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2022 to fully stop the co-funding of the CEB\u2019s and World Bank’s\u201c Flood Management\u201d Project which deteriorates flood protection, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2022 to urge the CEB and the World Bank to also stop the funding for the above-mentioned reasons, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2022 to coordinate an investigation on this large-scale misuse of funding, together with the European Commission’s Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), CEB\u2019s Office of the Chief Compliance Officer and the World Bank\u2019s Integrity Vice-Presidency, for the Flood Management Project (OVFMP), <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2022 to immediately initiate infringement proceedings against the Polish government for illegal expansion work and violation of EU directives, because the Polish authorities have already granted permission for the expansion of Oder including its immediate enforceability <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2022 to demand Polish and German authorities to comply with EU laws and stop the planned expansion of the Oder. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

We urge the CEB and World Bank <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2022 to stop the funding of economic interests under the false label of flood protection that even deteriorate flood protection. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

We call on the International Commission for the Protection of the Oder River against Pollution: <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2022 to listen to the citizens of Germany and Poland, and deal with the issue urgently, <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2022 to only include such flood protection projects into the International flood risk management plans which are agreed by all flood protection authorities, based on independent scientific evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Signatories:<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Non-Governmental Organizations International NGOs European <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

DECLARATION<\/a><\/h2>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

https:\/\/eko-unia.org.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/Joint-declaration_PL.pdf Joint declaration: Germany, Poland, European Commission, Council of Europe Development Bank and World Bank must STOP labeling expansion for economic interests as “flood protection\u201d STOP measures that actually deteriorate flood protection and infringe EU Environmental Law; STOP the expansion of the River Oder! We urge the European Commission and the German and Polish governments …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":17358,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[82],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/eko-unia.org.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17370"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/eko-unia.org.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/eko-unia.org.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eko-unia.org.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eko-unia.org.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17370"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/eko-unia.org.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17370\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17386,"href":"https:\/\/eko-unia.org.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17370\/revisions\/17386"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eko-unia.org.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17358"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/eko-unia.org.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17370"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eko-unia.org.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17370"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/eko-unia.org.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17370"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}